Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
tigger398

Whats up with those craters

Recommended Posts

Has anyone heard about those craters in Russia. I saw it on my home page. What are they.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are most curious and they look so clearly cut not like the craters in Florida or another place around the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they are saying that they are methane gas that has been trapped under the frozen tundra for God knows how long and global warming is causing the pressures to build from the permafrost melting and blowing the holes in the ground from the bottom up......

 

I don't personally believe one could get nature to carve a hole with such smooth sided....          It's just a guess on my part, but I'd say that someone is testing a new weapon from space.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are doing oil drilling in that area. Perhaps fracking or something like that is affecting it? There are many lakes in that area too that you can see on google earth that are that shape. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this concept of pingos very intriguing--but I have always liked geology.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I could see one up close.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By 7Dove77
      Sure hope,I placed this in the right forum:
       
      Ive been in the book of ( Ezek) ,doing some majior study,as always.And need some imput. And would be nice have some of your thoughts.
       
      Do you think ,this invasion comes during the peace talks,or Tribulation period?
       
      Russia,called "Rosh" in Hebrew of the Old Testiment.
                        King James Translation "Chief" in the following passages.
       
      Eze.38:1-3)-And the sword of the LORD came unto me,Saying, "Son of man,set thy face against Gog,the land of Magog,the chief prince od Meshech and Tubal,and prophecy  against him, "And say ,thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold,I am against thee,O Gog,the Chief prince of Meshech and Tubal.
       
           From what I gather," Rosh" is a place name,rather than a positional title,.Meshech is Russis capital,Moscow,
               Therefore,Magog is Russia,Its prince and leaders is Gog. This prophecy says,this will be an actual invasion.
       
      With that being said, (EZEK), writes it will happen the "Latter years" (Eze ,38:8).
       
      "And thou shall come against my people of Israel,as a cloud to cover the land,it shall be in the latter days,And I will bring thee against my land,that the heathen may know (Me),when I s So that the fishes of the seahall be sanctified in thee, O Gog,before their eyes, (Ezek 38:16).
       
      Heres another point (Ezek) offers in this scripture passage:
       
      "And it shall come to pass at the ( same time) when Gog shall come against the land of Israel,saith the Lord GOD,that my fury shall come up in my face, For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I  spoken, Surely in that day there shall be great shaking in the land of Israel. So that the fishes of the sea ,and the fowls of the heaven ,and the beast of the field,and all the creeping things that creep upon the earth,shall shake at my presence ,and the mountains shall be thrown down,and the steep places shall fall,and every wall shall fall to the ground. (Ezek.38:18-20).
       
      Notice,it said, (same time)................................................Ezek,shares with us another prophetic time marker of interesting,clarity.........Great study/Reading
      Your thoughts?
       
       
      Blessings,With Gods grace,
            7Dove77
    • By Da Servant
      By:  Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent   WASHINGTON, District of Columbia (WorthyNews) -- The United States government, under President Obama, is acquiring chemical weapons from Syria for use in drone strikes.   Under the pretense of destroying Syria's chemical weapons stockpile, the United States will begin processing their own chemical weapons on board the MV Cape Ray.   Marketed as being used in the destruction of these stockpiles, it conflicts with a report from 2013 that the United States government recently destroyed four chemical weapons incinerators located within the United States.  The Pentagon spent $10.2 billion over three decades burning tons of deadly nerve gas and other chemical weapons stored in four states — some of the agents so deadly even a few drops can kill.   The United States Army is currently spending $1.3 billion on a project dismantling the incinerators they spent so much money on building and using.   The MV Cape Ray was built in 1977 by Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd., Japan, and called the MV Seaspeed Asia.  It was acquired by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration April 29, 1991, and named the Cape Ray February 1, 1994.   The MV Cape Ray is currently in the Caribbean Sea heading toward the Mediterranean where it will meet up with ships from Denmark and Norway, which will then transfer a portion of Syria's chemical weapons stockpile for use in U.S. drone strikes.   The current position of the Cape Ray contradicts press releases from www.afp.com and www.defensenews.com/ which state that the vessel is still two weeks from being seaworthy due to the supposed outfitting of the ship with equipment designed to destroy chemical weapons.   The need for the U.S. to acquire chemical weapons from Syria is thrown into question by Frank Kendall, a top Pentagon weapons-buyer, said on Jan. 2.   "This is not new technology.  This is not a high-risk thing that hasn't been done before.  This technology has been used for the past 10 years to destroy our own chemical weapons," he said.   In 1993, the United States ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which prohibits the "development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, and transfer or use of chemical weapons."  If Mr. Kendall is to be believed, it appears that the United States only started destroying its chemical weapons stockpile in 2003, the same time as the passage of the Syria Accountability Act, signed by then-President George W. Bush.   Another piece of information that gives rise to the belief that the U.S. is trying to weaponize and/or use chemical weapons in drone strikes is the cost.  According to an unnamed U.S. official, “The system in question is a neutralization system.  It is both more expensive and less reliable than incineration due to the need to deal with the millions of gallons of waste product.”   If the sea-based hydrolysis system is more costly than incineration, why go through the trouble of building it?  A safer guess would be that there is no intention to neutralize these chemicals, but the "increased cost" is the actual cost of building a sea-based chemical weapons production facility.   Another suspicious piece of information is the fact that the MV Cape Ray, owned by the United States government, is flying the flag of the Marshall Islands.  While it is true that the Marshall Islands were once governed by the United States, they received full autonomy in 1986 under a "Compact of Free Association" with the United States, and have been an independent nation ever since.   Syria's chemical weapons stockpile was picked up at the port town of Latakia.  Latakia is approximately 53.53 miles from the city of Tartus, which, in 2012, was speculated to be the site of a chemical weapons pickup from Syria by Russia .  It was believed at the time that Russia would take possession of the chemical (and biological) weapons and agents from Syria, process them in facilities in Russia, and then deliver them to Syria at a later date.   The drones, which are set to carry chemical weapons into battle, are to be used not only in joint military efforts around the world, but also with "combination forces," that is, U.S. and foreign militaries fighting as a single force.   Another mystery surrounding the situation is the need for rapid transfer of said weapons into international control.  According to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, the "amount and type of chemical weapons must be agreed and "rapidly" placed under international control."   The amount and type agreed portion of the statement suggests that only certain types of chemicals and weapons were held in interest.  That they should be desired for "rapid transfer" to international control, indicates that the United Nations has an interest in acquiring chemical weapons, not for the purpose of destroying them, but for using them, possibly on dissident or rogue nations and/or people.   While this conclusion may seen incredible, even conspiracy theorist in nature, it clearly fits the evidence at hand.  The only question now is, "Who will be on the receiving end of the wrath of the United States, Russia, and the United Nations?"   Source information links can be found at the following website:  http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/01/president-obama-acquiring-chemical.html
    • By OakWood
      http://za.news.yahoo.com/russian-muslim-clerics-warn-unrest-over-ban-translation-212618321.html
       
      Make of this what you will.
×